Resources · Tool guides
Best ChatGPT visibility trackers (2026)
The short answer
A ChatGPT visibility tracker answers one question. When a buyer asks ChatGPT about your category, does it name you, and what does it say? The tools below all do that. They part ways on how many engines they watch, how honest their numbers are, and whether they help you change the answer or only report it.
We ranked seven of them. The order reflects coverage, the quality of the evidence behind each number, whether the tool helps you act, and price. If you are new to how the model actually picks brands, the short version lives in our note on ChatGPT Search: it reads live pages, cites them, and leans on the sources that agree about you.
| # | Tool | Best for | Notable | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PageLensOUR PICK | Measuring visibility and acting on it in one platform | Every major engine with the verbatim answer, then writes and publishes the fix to your own domain | $49/mo |
| 2 | Profound | Enterprise measurement with a large prompt index | 400M-prompt index and SOC 2; the $99 starter tracks ChatGPT only | $99/mo |
| 3 | Otterly.ai | The cheapest way to start watching AI mentions | Coverage % plus a sentiment score; Gemini and Google AI Mode cost extra | $29/mo |
| 4 | Peec AI | Clean analytics for marketing teams | Auto-classifies prompts (including competitor-named ones) with answer-level data | ~$95/mo |
| 5 | Scrunch AI | Honest, separated metrics with a CX focus | Keeps presence, position and citations as separate rates, no black-box score | From $250/mo |
| 6 | Rankscale | Flexible, low-cost tracking | Scheduling from hourly to monthly; headline is a composite with undisclosed weights | $20/mo |
| 7 | AthenaHQ | Agent-driven analysis and demand discovery | Prompt-type filtering on every metric, demand clustered from Search Console | $295/mo |
01PageLens
PageLens measures how you land across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, with the exact answer and the sources it cited behind every number. Where the other trackers stop, it keeps going. It finds the owned sources that move your visibility, writes citation-ready pages from your real content and competitors, publishes them to your own domain over DNS, generates social posts, and runs an outreach agent to earn mentions from sites the models already trust. That is the loop no other tool here closes. The honest limitation: it is newer than the enterprise incumbents, so it does not carry a 400M-prompt corpus or a SOC 2 badge that some procurement teams will insist on. At $49/mo it is built for teams that want to act on the data, not archive it.
02Profound
Profound is the measurement leader for large organizations. It runs a 400M-prompt index, carries SOC 2, and ships polished dashboards that refresh about once a day across ten or more engines. Two things to know before you buy. The $99 starter tracks ChatGPT only, and the full platform is priced for enterprise procurement, roughly $2,000 to $5,000 a month. Profound Actions are guidance rather than a product that writes and ships, so the page and the outreach still land on your team.
03Otterly.ai
Otterly.ai is the budget entry point at $29/mo and a reasonable first signal. It reports a coverage percentage and a sentiment score, refreshed once a day. Two caveats keep it lower on the list. It has no default split between branded and unbranded prompts, so a question that already names your brand can quietly inflate the score. And Gemini plus Google AI Mode are paid add-ons rather than part of the base product.
04Peec AI
Peec AI has one of the cleanest data models in the category. It auto-classifies prompts, including the competitor-named ones that skew a visibility number, and gives you answer-level data with a credible per-response fan-out, refreshed once a day. For a marketing team that wants honest numbers, it is a strong choice. The catch is that it stops at the chart. Peec shows you the opportunity and leaves the writing, publishing and outreach to you.
05Scrunch AI
Scrunch AI is refreshingly plain about its math. Rather than a single opaque score, it keeps presence, position, citations and referral as separate rates, framed around AI customer experience. That discipline is the draw. Self-serve starts around $250 a month, though, and like most of this list it ends at measurement. You get an honest diagnosis and then handle the fix yourself.
06Rankscale
Rankscale is cheap and flexible. Scheduling runs from hourly to monthly at $20/mo, and it is one of the few tools candid enough to name a volatility surface instead of pretending answers hold still. The trade-off sits in the headline. Its Visibility Score is a composite whose weights are not published, so you are trusting a number you cannot fully take apart.
07AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ takes an agent-driven approach. It filters metrics by prompt type on every endpoint and clusters demand from Google Search Console data, running on a Monday, Wednesday and Friday default schedule. It starts at $295/mo. The agents analyze well, but they do not write or publish, so acting on what they surface happens somewhere else.
How we ranked these
Five things decided the order. None of them is a vibe; each maps to something you can check in a vendor’s own docs.
- Engine coverage. How many of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Copilot and Google AI Mode a tool watches by default, not as a paid add-on. Buyers do not all use the same assistant.
- Prompt volume and cadence. How many buyer questions it runs, and how often. A single daily run of one prompt is noisy: only about 16% of recommended brands hold steady across ten identical runs, so repetition and trend matter more than any one snapshot.
- Accuracy and evidence. Whether each metric opens to the verbatim answer and the sources it cited, or asks you to trust a composite score with hidden weights.
- Whether it helps you act.Does the tool stop at a dashboard, or does it help you change the answer: find the source that’s beating you, write the page, publish it, earn the citation. This is where most trackers go quiet.
- Price, and honesty about it. What the real product costs, not the teaser tier that tracks one engine.
So which one
If you only want to see how ChatGPT talks about you, any tracker here will show you. Otterly.ai and Rankscale do it for the least money. Profound and Peec AI do it most thoroughly. PageLens is the one that treats the number as the start of the work rather than the end, which is why it sits at the top for teams that plan to change the answer, not just read it. Start by seeing where you stand with a free AI visibility audit, then decide how much of the loop you want to run yourself.
Common questions
- Can you track ChatGPT visibility for free?
- You can do a rough version by hand: ask ChatGPT the questions your buyers ask, run each a few times, and note whether it names you and who it names instead. That tells you where you stand today, but not the trend. A paid tracker automates the runs across engines and stores every answer, which is what you need to see change over weeks. A free audit is a good first pass before you pay for anything.
- How often do ChatGPT's answers change?
- More than most people expect. Only about 16% of recommended brands hold steady across ten identical runs of the same prompt, and live search re-crawls on its own schedule while training data updates in big, infrequent jumps. That is why a single check tells you little. You want a tool that runs prompts repeatedly and shows the trend rather than one snapshot.
- Is a visibility tracker enough on its own?
- A tracker tells you the score; it does not change it. To move the number you still have to write the page ChatGPT will quote, publish it where the model reads, and earn mentions on the sources it already trusts. Most tools on this list stop at the dashboard and leave that work to you. PageLens is the one that carries it through in the same platform.